Small Pair Particle Table using pure mathematics. (see link below)

[t***@bigberthathing.com]

Small Pair Particle Table using pure mathematics. (see link below)
This cannot be done using only CERN experimental results.
It relies on the classical conjecture that a neutron plus
a positron is equal to a proton. All neutral particles have
been reduced by .2% All particles with no known charge have
been taken as both. The positive charge has same mass and the
neutral charge has the reduction. Neither generates a pair,
but can only do so with a separate particle. These rules
generate the pairs in the table. The error margin is nominal
in place of the slide rule accuracy of the CERN results.
The above indicates that all particles have a pair.
The above rules and giving all particles a pair derives 4741
particles from the 1000 experimental results of CERN.

The software has been updated to version 5 and has no glass
ceiling. It is ready to run using only the input files
particle.dat and particle.txt Output file electron.lst for option 1
and particle.lst for option 2 need to be renamed or deleted prior
to each run. The first four answers to option 1 are 3, 4000, 2 and 9.
Option 3 has 5 answers;- minus goes back one, plus goes forward 20,
even goes back to first, quit exits this particle and more looks at
next page of this particle. For type 88 reduce the error margin and
for type 99 increase the error margin. The range is affected by
adjustments to the first error margin in the two dat and txt files and
subsequent error margins within them.
http://www.bigberthathing.com/pair10th.html

3.5d-06 down to 1.0d-06 down to 7.0d-07 down to 3.5d-07
pair10th 4000 v5 199999150000903

[t***@bigberthathing.com]

It is a 50 year scientific project.
This is year 51.
You may had heard of the Periodic Table of Elements, like Hydrogen, Helium and Carbon.
I am trying to find a Periodic Table of Particles, like protons,
neutrons and electrons, which are the three that make up the atom.
CERN has an experimental list of 1000 particles to slide rule
accuracy, but no order or classification. They default to the
Monte Carlo system, which is random and anything but a system.

I found out how to put 50 into a table, but needed far, far better
than slide rule accuracy. That makes it pure mathematics. Taking
experimental results to extremes to see where it leads. Three famous
pure mathematicians used to meet in Birmingham.
Their toast was "May it never be any use to anyone."

So far I have expanded the 1000 CERN particle list to 4741 derived
particles. I also used a plastic geometry model making kit to work
out 1718 structures like a pyramid and a cube. My programs only
include 10 structures at the moment and has a glass ceiling.

Next update gets rid of the glass ceiling and second update includes
39 more structures, third includes 700 structures and fourth 1718 structures.
My last job was as senior programmer.(1990)
It is not as bad as it looks as there are only 14 equations needed
and only the two for the 1000 last structures are left outstanding.
Tony Lance 20th January 2017
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Post by t***@bigberthathing.com
Small Pair Particle Table using pure mathematics. (see link below)